Brainwashed has ratings and 70 reviews. Jafar said: A new study suggests feeling powerful dampens a part of the brain that helps us connect with oth. Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience by Sally Satel and Scott Lilienfeld is an important book on an emerging. Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience. Article (PDF Available) in Theology and Science 12(1) · February with.
|Published (Last):||24 November 2008|
|PDF File Size:||10.17 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.14 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Eeductive very thought provoking work. So Richard Nixon demanded drug testing to be done and made it so no one could return to the States unless they passed. Slavish reliance on wisps of premature, mindpess neuroscience is creating misunderstanding as to how to help the most seriously ill. Veel fysiologische bevindingen blijken samen te hangen met gedrag, neuroscifnce dat is nog niet genoeg om gedrag juist te voorspellen.
Once back in the states, the fear of arrest, the high price of heroine and the shady drug culture didn’t seem worth the risk, so most just transitioned back into ordinary life.
They’re right, a fMRI makes a lousy lie detector for all the reasons they say. Neuroscience has indeed made remarkable progress in the understanding of brain structure and function. Aug 13, Omar M. Can’t explain life, consciousness, or free-will? Everything from crime to general cognition, we think the fMRI can do anything and it can’t. Satel counters that these small samples were enveloped in larger demonstrations of free brainwasjed.
The problem they identify has real consequence. And now with the invention of fMRI, all of these interventions will soon be accompanied by psychedelically colored amalgamated photos of lit up brains ‘proving’ they’re true.
Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience by Sally L. Satel
Sure, mindlsss responsible for what we do, but there is a genetic component. Nov 24, Kaitlin rated it liked it Shelves: And though their delineation of how popular thinkers have misused neuroscience seemed by and large accurate and necessary, I’m still waiting for a book that can put it all into perspective without the libertarian agenda.
The job of neuroscience is to elucidate the brain mechanisms associated with mental phenomena, and when technical prowess is applied to the questions it can usefully address, the prospects for conceptual breakthroughs and clinical advances are bountiful.
You don’t need an MRI, duh. What, stopped me from scoring the book with a full five stars, is that Statel and Lilianfeld do not stop themselves from occasionally indulging to far in their own speculative philosophizing. Happily, the authors of this book did all the work for me. Earlier in the late nineteenth neuroscienfe twentieth centuries, Freudianism posited that people were the products of unconscious conflicts and drives.
Just add the word “therapy” to anything. A well written book based upon seductjve premise the application of fMRI neurological testing has significant limitations regarding suspected correlations between brain function and mental process. I’ve always been curious about the brainwashing system in cults, politics, religion, etc Open Preview See a Problem? The irony is that any pop neuroscience book that you pick up boasts about the complexity of the human brain — brainsashed it’s the most co “A new study suggests feeling powerful dampens a part of neurosciencd brain that helps us connect with others,” is what I read in an article on NPR yesterday.
The authors would have made a much better book if they would have provided the other perspective. It doesn’t just neurosckence one function, but many, so a speculative interpretation is required. Neuroscience is very young, and Wow, this was an excellent read. Co-written by a psychologist and a psychiatrist, “Brainwashed: Jan 29, Bldrs rated it it was amazing.
Review: Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience | HuffPost
The authors of this book have a valid point in that these braiinwashed every emotion and thought and act is being wrongly associated with a brain activity pattern in an fMRI scan. A decent introduction to the dangers of using neuroscientific evidence for a reader who has little or no background in psychology or neuroscience.
I would recommend one of those instead of this book.
Very useful book that debunks many sedhctive the claims made about how brain scans can explain so much about human behavior. For instance, she explains the different techniques used to gather the neatly colored brain scan pictures, between fMRI, PET and ECG, and, with deep concern she thoroughly explores the misguided notions that conclusions can be drawn and applied in our courtrooms and society at the current state of it’s scientific analysis.
The book could be summed up as: Technology for studying the operation of the brain has been widely discussed in the media–as have those slides from f MRI functional magnetic resonance imaging that show certain parts of the brain “lighting up” in response to stimuli.
Our feelings on race? However, according to the authors, we are still years perhaps decades away from truly clarifying the mi A well written book based upon the premise the application of fMRI neurological testing has significant limitations regarding suspected correlations between brain function and mental process.
The authors go on to tell what neuroscience and the colorful functional magnetic resonance imaging fMRI scans do reveal — the tendency of some areas of the brain to use more oxygen given certain stimuli — and don’t reveal — why to choose Coke over Pepsi or murder someone.
She shows the how dangerous David Eaglemen’s ideas are in “Incognito” concerning how the whole justice system should be changed, since all crime is caused by malfunctioning brains.
Review: Brainwashed: The Seductive Appeal of Mindless Neuroscience
Roy King rated it really liked it. Yeah, she had some excellent reflections on all of these things. Neurocriticism is itself an emerging field led by people like Neurocritic, James CoyneNeuroskeptic and other scientists who object to real neuroscience being diluted with false claims in the pursuit of pop-psychology headlines.
Once this was announced, almost everyone just stopped using the drugs. Nov 21, Pandit rated neuroscienfe really liked it Shelves: The authors speak mindleas the danger of “neurodeterminism” Technology for studying the operation of the brain has been widely discussed in the media–as have those slides from f MRI functional magnetic resonance imaging that show certain parts of the brain “lighting up” in response to stimuli.
Feb 26, Mike rated it liked it. Jan 04, Steven Peterson rated it really liked it. For instance, one study offered evidence that the mind is a figment of the brain. In fact, much of the authors’ contention in this book comes down to that question of human agency and the inadequacy of fallacious determinism that tries to reduce human experience to physical causes.